Windows Server - vpn form netbook

Asked By Mark Lewis
06-Feb-10 08:18 AM
Hi I guess I might be posting on the group sorry if I am, could ypu advise
which group I should use?

I can vpn connect to the server (sbs2k) with xp or 2k that are members of
the domain. I have just bought a netbook which has xp home, when I create a
vpn connection it just sits there verifing user name & password the times
out, the netbook is not joined to the domain (xp home).

can any one recommend any advise?

Thanks

Mark
Linux
(1)
XP
(1)
VPN
(1)
Workplace
(1)
CanWhat
(1)
Grover
(1)
Connectivity
(1)
Wasavailable
(1)
  Joe replied to Mark Lewis
06-Feb-10 09:47 AM
Presumably you are asking if XP Home can connect to an SBS2003 domain by
VPN, and the answer is yes. I have made little use of VPN from home for a
couple of years now, but when I used it often, I normally did so from a
Linux computer, which was certainly not a domain member. I have also
used XP Home.

It may not be a joyful experience, as it seems to me that a domain
member computer never has problems accessing network resources,
something which can be a bit hit-or-miss for an unjoined one. You'll
also need to enter account details more than once. But it should connect
without difficulty. It is possible to join an XP Pro machine to a domain
over VPN, so it must be able to connect initially as a non-member.

So treat this as a normal 'VPN does not work' troubleshooting exercise.
Have a look in the System Event log on the server at the appropriate
time, to see if the server accepted the TCP/1723 connection but did not
get the follow-up protocol 47 (GRE) messages. That's generally the
reason why the client says 'connected OK', but authentication does not
happen. The authentication negotiation is the first data passed through
the GRE tunnel.

If that is the case, then look for something different about the route to
the server. You do not say whether the netbook is using the same Internet
connection as the domain members you mention earlier. If it is, then
it is something about the netbook itself that is the problem, probably
the firewall. The built-in XP firewall should not need any configuration
to be a VPN client, but a third-party firewall will.

Also, if you are trying this from the same location, only one PPTP VPN
at a time can be made between two IP addresses. If a VPN is already open
between the client and server addresses, then no further connection can
be made through the same route.

If you are trying to connect through a public wifi system, something a
netbook may well be used for, remember that many if not all will filter
the connection, limiting it to common protocols. A well-known pub chain
in the UK has free wifi access, but passes neither SSH nor OpenVPN. I
have not tried it with PPTP VPN, but I doubt whether that will work
either. Quite a few business-type hotels have heard about VPN, and allow
TCP/1723 through, but some are clearly unaware that they also need to
pass GRE.

--
Joe
  SteveB replied to Joe
06-Feb-10 11:16 AM
Upgrade to SBS 2008 (why did not you do that to SBS 2003 when it was
available) and you will also have a great remote connectivity goodie built
in-RWW (Remote Web Workplace). SBS 2000 is mighty old by now!
  Russ SBITS.Biz [SBS-MVP] replied to SteveB
06-Feb-10 12:09 PM
Mark yes you can
What AV came on it?
Temp Disable the AV and see if it connects
Russ

--
Russell Grover - SBITS.Biz [SBS-MVP]
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist
24hr SBS Remote Support - www.SBITS.Biz
Question or Second Opinion $25.00 - www.PersonalITConsultant.com
Free Trial Microsoft Online Services - www.Microsoft-Online-Services.com
  Mark Lewis replied to Joe
06-Feb-10 10:21 AM
Thanks, tried with my phone dongle and it worked
  Mark Lewis replied to SteveB
06-Feb-10 05:15 PM
would love to upgrade, only 10 connect to it and I havn't got the time to
learn about 2003/8 as the IT part of my job is small compared to my other
role.

Thank all
  Jim Behning SBS MVP replied to Mark Lewis
06-Feb-10 08:30 PM
A thought is the SBS 2000 is no longer supported. The hardware that
software was loaded on is probably long in the tooth also. Every SBS
2000 I have left in the field has blown up in the past 6 months. I or
my associates got the customers working with "new" old hardware but
not after a few days of lost productivity. Still having a hard time
getting old doctors who should have retired to get a new server.


See what SBS support is working on
http://blogs.technet.com/sbs/default.aspx
Check your SBS with the SBS Best Practices Analyzer
http://blogs.technet.com/sbs/archive/tags/BPA/default.aspx
Create New Account
help
other through a Wireless-N Gigabit Router (model number WRT310N). One PC is running Windws XP while the other is running Windows 7. At this point I do not have, or would, however, like to call web pages on the Windows 7 PC from the Windows XP PC. The Windows 7 PC has php files that run C++ files to analyze files supplied by the Windows XP PC and I would like to send the results of the analysis back to the XP PC. The reason for this is that I am setting up a home based web I want to keep hackers from accessing files on my Windows 7 PC. So the XP will be connected directly to the Internet and the Windows 7 PC will only be connected to the XP PC. I can successfully ping both ways between the Windows 7 PC and XP PC. So I fire up FireFox (FF) on the XP PC and type the following in the FF URL box. [Win7PCIPAddress] / SharedDirectoryOnWin7PC / FileName.hmtl The
if this makes any difference. Meantime anyone any ideas ? Jim. Windows Server SBS Discussions Windows XP (1) Windows Server 2008 (1) Windows Server 2003 (1) Microsoft Exchange (1) Windows Update (1 the users have Outlook 2003. . Jim. Hi Cliff, All the client PC's are Windows XP SP3 and Office 2003 SP3 The only thing changed on the client PC's was works fine from there as well. Only seems to be an issue with the Windows XP PC's Would Windows Server 2008 and Windows 7 have Search Indexing as part of signing on the SBS 2008 and doing a restart. I do not think that the XP PC's have Windows Search installed. . .perhaps I should do this then ? is this not Windows 2008 Terminal Server desktops OK and a Windows 7 machine. So it seems Windows XP Pro related ? There is not any Window Search indexer installed on the XP machines, I will give that a go next. BTW all the Autotuning network features are answer your previous question, Vista, 7 & 2008 have the Windows = Desktop Search installed by default. XP would need it installed. It = should have come across with a Windows Update unless you it has not made any difference. Another thing done at the same time on the XP PC's was the addition of add in Gigabit network cards. Guess it could be
VPN client Windows Server I have a successful VPN connection to my Sever2k3. The client is XP2. I can access all the resources on 192.168.1.101, it does not connect. Any ideas? Windows Server Discussions Describe (1) VPN connection (1) VPN server (1) VPN client (1) VPN setup (1) VPN (1) Network topology (1) can you ping 192.168.1.101 If so, can you out message". You'll need to describe your network topology better. Is this a new VPN setup? Are you talking about a site-to-site connnection or a client to a
Printing from Linux host fails LPDSVC: Event ID 4007. SimulatePassThrough ineffective Windows Server Well, this is really not question. I have a windows only printer that is attached to a windows machine (Windows XP Professional SP 3). I have followed this guide to redirect the port and set up service is running, and I have changed its scope to accept connections only from the linux host. Yes, port 515 is open and I can telnet to it. In the Event Viewer, I have this persistent failure to accept print jobs from the linux host: Source: LPDSVC Event ID: 4007 Type: Warning Illegal format used for commands received from 192.168.0.1 : service refused (192.168.0.1 is the linux host) Correspondingly, the error on the linux host is / usr / lib / cups / backend / lpd failed. I have tried to add (a) SimulatePassThrough the second one (b). No use. Retstarted spooler and lpdsvc. Rebooted. Restarted cups on the linux host. No use. Suggestions ? (No, buying a decent cross platform printer is out of the for the office, so I am stuck with this one.) Windows Server Setup Discussions Windows XP (1) Linux (1) Page (1) Translation (1) Control (1) Linux Samba print server (1) Natural
Discussions Windows Server 2003 (1) Windows Server 2008 (1) Active Directory (1) Windows Server (1) Linux (1) Postfix (1) Bit (1) Standard (1) http: / / msmvps.com / blogs / bradley / archive / tags / Migration users whose IT requirements are actually quite basic. An argument oft-touted by Microsoft against Linux is that total cost of ownership is higher where complex, manual installation procedures are involved. Yet, the time involved in setting-up or upgrading a Linux server would be only a microscopic fraction of this SBS-upgrade process. I really have where this SBS product is going. It strikes me that either standard Windows Server or Linux are both better options in the long run. I am not necessarily a fanatical Linux advocate BTW, but I do think some comparisons in overall useability -or the lack of It ain't a walk in the park ripping out a network and going to Linux either. This is active directory glue. Migration is not easy period. Add to the change is usually worth the savings in this regard.) If running an SBS server over a Linux or standard Windows Server solution saves you an hour a week of work then you have a TCO less than alternatives. Where can those savings come in? When compare to Linux, several key components surface immediately. Client Management. SBS is designed to be installed as a