Windows Server - 2008 R2 to 2003 R2 replication health report
Asked By JDB
07-Nov-09 08:22 PM
Background:
I recently added a 2008 R2 server to our system. We were replicating
between 2 sites with FRS and I migrated to DFS (Domain). This is a single
domain/forest AD in mixed mode. We are in the process of migrating from SBS
2003 R2. I am replicating (successfully) between the 2008 R2 (LA-Server) and
2003 R2 (SofiaServer) servers.
All software firewalls are turned off. There is no port blocking. The
networks are connected via a hardware firewall's VPN. I am running the
report from the a Domain Administrator account.
DCDIAG looks perfect on both ends. netdom query fsmo looks right also.
I am still working through the technote listed, but so far, no problems.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/839880
Problem:
The Health Reports do not work. Each server can see it is own data but cannot
see the others.
The error is when runnig the report on 2008 R2 is (IP addresses and domain
names change to protect the innocent):
DNS name: sofiaserver.mydomain.local
Domain name: mydomain.local
Reference domain controller: --
IP address: 192.168.101.150
Site: SofiaSite
Time zone: --
ERRORS (There is 1 error to report)
Cannot connect to reporting DCOM server.
Description: Access is denied.
Last occurred: Saturday, November 07, 2009 at 11:42:36 AM (GMT-8:00)
Suggested action: Verify that the DFS Replication Service is installed on
the server and that RPC traffic is not blocked by firewalls or port
filtering. For information about troubleshooting RPC issues see RPC KB
839880.
--
TIA,
Jonathan D. Brown
Net Data Systems, Inc.
Report
(1)
VPN
(1)
SofiaServer
(1)
SofiaSite
(1)
Saturday
(1)
November
(1)
Firewalls
(1)
USERDATA
(1)
JDB replied to JDB
Actually I have an error running reports on SofiaServer:
Cannot access DFS Replication performance counters.
Affected replicated folders: All replicated folders on this server.
Description: The DFS Replication service is unable to access the
performance counter DFS Replicated
Folders(USERDATA-{4F427033-39EE-4639-BCB6-6830B7A4E77A})\File Installs
Succeeded on SOFIASERVER. Performance data is unavailable. Error ID:
0x800007d5.
Last occurred: 09 ?????????????? 2009 ??. at 02:04:52 (GMT2:00)
Suggested action: For information about troubleshooting this problem, see
.
--
Regards,
Jonathan D. Brown
Net Data Systems, Inc.
VPN client Windows Server I have a successful VPN connection to my Sever2k3. The client is XP2. I can access all the resources on 192.168.1.101, it does not connect. Any ideas? Windows Server Discussions Describe (1) VPN connection (1) VPN server (1) VPN client (1) VPN setup (1) VPN (1) Network topology (1) can you ping 192.168.1.101 If so, can you out message". You'll need to describe your network topology better. Is this a new VPN setup? Are you talking about a site-to-site connnection or a client to a
Reverse-ISA Antivirus: SEP Someone please help me in resolving the issue WSUS Client Diagnostic report: WSUS Client Diagnostics Tool Checking Machine State Checking for admin rights to run tool . . . . . . . . . PASS Agent * Windows Update access disabled: No 2010-02-09 10:04:59:416 1164 1478 Report * ** ** ** ** ** Report: Initializing static reporting data * ** ** ** ** ** 2010-02-09 10:04:59:417 1164 1478 Report * OS Version = 6.0.6001.1.0.65792 2010-02-09 10:04:59:417 1164 1478 Report * OS Product Type = 0x00000004 2010-02-09 10:04:59:442 1164 1478 Report * Computer Brand = Dell Inc. 2010-02-09 10:04:59:442 1164 1478 Report * Computer Model = OptiPlex 760 2010-02-09 10:04:59:444 1164 1478 Report * Bios Revision = A03 2010-02-09 10:04:59:444 1164 1478 Report * Bios Name
2010-03-20 12:00:18 2010-03-20 12:30:22:525 1224 1530 Report REPORT EVENT: {9FA8FF7C-DF50-4FE3-B3DE-32515A0CCBC5} 2010-03-20 12:30:17:524+0530 1 failed to detect with error 0x80244017. 2010-03-20 12:30:22:525 1224 1530 Report REPORT EVENT: {D7B54563-5A47-4E88-83DA-EF8B19703E6E} 2010-03-20 12:30:18:902+0530 1 failed to detect with error 0x80244017. 2010-03-20 12:30:22:536 1224 1530 Report CWERReporter::HandleEvents - WER report upload completed with status 0x8 2010-03-20 12:30:22:536 1224 1530 Report WER Report sent: 7.4.7600.226 0x80244017 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 Scan 101 Managed 2010
to be nothing wrong with the process in that instance. in the log file "Monitoring Report Detailed Network Report 2010-06-06-06-00-00-0135.log" i get the results below. is there 00:00.826868 : * ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Starting GenerateMonitoringReport task. . . * ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 2010-05-07T06:00:00.826868 : Generating Summary Network Report. . . 2010-05-07T06:01:04.590244 : XML generated. . . 2010-05-07T06:01:04.786264 : HTML generated. . . 2010-05-07T06:01:04.802265 : Report stored in archives. . . 2010-05-07T06:01:07.64855 : Failed to send report email. 2010-05-07T06:01:07.64955 : Generating Summary Network Report finished. 2010-05-07T06:01:07.64955 : * ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** GenerateMonitoringReport task finished. * ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Windows Server SBS Discussions Generating Summary Network Report (1) Network Report (1) Exchange (1) Failed (1) Report (1) SMTP (1) Server report (1) There is provision
repot that shows what computers need what updates? I can (and have) exported the above report into Excel and manipulated it but I know that will become very time consuming. The workstations, x64, wsus, sql are examples of our groups), so the "all-approved" built-in report does not seem to work well. What I found online earlier today on the custom Server Update Services Discussions Excel (1) Exception (1) Computer (1) Lawrence Garvin (1) Otherwise (1) Report (1) Status (1) Update (1) All of the standard WSUS reports show what updates are needed by each of the computers selected for the report. Perhaps I am misunderstanding the question? - - Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA, MCSA Principal approved" patches with the computers that need them. What would be helpful would be a report that showed the computers that need the "approved" updates. Otherwise I have to take the custom report, export it and manipulate it in Exel (not that I have not already done that is *anything* that gets installed (exception is AV definition updates) on the computer, so that report in the form of "this computer needs these approved patches" would be perfect. Mike If generate summary and detailed reports if tabular does not suit you, you can change the report type before running it. Of course, these reports will not help you if a security