Scott Colestock replied...
I would maybe take a look at encoding issues - is there a chance the message
is arriving as, for instance, utf-16 without a BOM ?
(I see you have an http header of Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary)
Scott Colestock
www.traceofthought.net
Encoding
(1)
Chance
(1)
Message
(1)
Arriving
(1)
Instance
(1)
Header
(1)
Content
(1)
Transfer
(1)
Aaron replied...
Thanks, Scott. This very well may be. I had issues with a test file
sent to the customer that contained a BOM and their system wouldn't
accept it. I'll look into it. Is there a site that lists the required
encodings with or without BOM?
Thanks again.
-ak
Tomas Restrepo [MVP] replied...
Aaron,
I'm assuming you're using the SMIME decoder on your receive pipeline, right?
Anyway, the error you're getting usually means that the disassemblers were
not able to interpret the message correctly, normally caused by an encoding
problem. You might want to check what encoding the message is in (possibly
right after decoding but before disassembly) and, if necessary, insert an
intermediate component on the pipeline that tells biztalk what encoding to
use to interpret the message (such as the FixEncodingComponent you'll find
on my website).
--
Tomas Restrepo
http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/
Aaron replied...
Tomas, I was not using the SMIME decoder. I'm new to the encryption
algorithms and am gladly learning as I go here. So, I'll start with
that and have the trading partner resubmit the message.
I've used your encoding component once before on another engagement
and must say that it was (is) very helpful. Thanks for offering it up!
I'll be trying it next if the MIME/SMIME decoding isn't the solution.
-ak
Aaron replied...
Tomas, I setup a receive pipeline component to use the MIME decoder
component. I set the mime decoder "Body part content type" =
pipeline component in the HTTP receive port location. I still get the
same error. It seems that with these settings I'd expect the xml to be
broken out of the original message by the pipeline component. Is that
what should happen?
If I send the message as just the raw xml, it gets processed
successfully. So, it seems that if I can just get the MIME decoder to
work, all will be good.
-ak
Aaron replied...
The customer sending the document claims that they aren't using MIME
at all. We are using two-way SSL cert authentication to encrypt/
decrypt the transfer. So, does IIS or BTS convert this to a MIME
message? This is really confusing.
-ak
Aaron replied...
Tomas, thanks for your persistence in the matter. I'll try to draft of
a copy of their post shortly. where should I send it?
Also, I noticed that in the S/MIME structure that they don't include
the boundary (_Part_26352_30390425.1184093739947). Do you think that
this may have anything to do with not parsing out the body?
Tomas Restrepo [MVP] replied...
Hi Aaron,
Just send it to my email (reply to this message to the author)
Humm, not sure yet.. I'll look at it in detail when you send me the message!
--
Tomas Restrepo
http://www.devdeo.com/
http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/
Aaron replied...
The customer claims that they are sending the document in utf-8. I
noticed that they didn't include the MIME version or the boundary for
part as it is multipart. So, I was able to include the following text
at the top of the document and have BTS successfully parse the
document...
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Multipart/Related;boundary=----
=_Part_44402_2241816.1184609080873;
As I am new to the world of S/MIME, I'm unsure how their system could
send the message without this information. They are a recognized
resource in B2B for mining companies. So, it seems that I must be the
one missing something.
-ak
Tomas Restrepo [MVP] replied...
Hi Aaron,
Now, that's pretty funky. On the other side, the good news is that at least
knowing that, it could be possible to inject that small piece through a
custom pipeline component sitting in front of the S/MIME decoder (heck, the
FixMsg sample component in the SDK should be able to take care of it with
little or no modification).
--
Tomas Restrepo
http://www.devdeo.com/
http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/
Aaron replied...
Tomas, I saw in the context information of the received message that
there was a reference to the boundary. As you are probably aware,
BizTalk strips any http headers out into the context. Here, I also saw
AS2 references mixed with other MIME headers. This lead me to believe
that they were intending the connection for an AS2 adapter for an EDI
system (which was a connection that they had built previously for our
EDI system) - yikes. So, I had them post without signing the doc and
it came through successfully.
The AS2 MIME format didn't have the "MIME-Version: 1.0" header. I
think that was causing the glitch as BizTalk probably relies on this
(and the boundary setting) to interpret the MIME format.
Thanks for all your help.
-ak
Tomas Restrepo [MVP] replied...
Hi Aaron,
Ahh, that makes a lot of sense; thanks for posting the explanation. I'm not
very familiar with EDI and AS2 myself, so that's why I didn't spot it :)
You could certainly also consider (eventually) exposing an AS2 endpoint to
them to keep the signing features instead of using plain HTTP. There are a
few companies that sell AS2 adapters for BizTalk, and BizTalk 2006 R2 will
come with a built-in AS2 adapter, fwiw.
--
Tomas Restrepo
http://www.devdeo.com/
http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/

Duplicate Message Windows Server Receiving duplicate messages. Using SBS2K3 with POP3 Connector to ISP. I checked mailbox 26 -0700 thread-index: AcgNAA229lkWCPy+R66tvd90XDyaww = = Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:45:26 -0700 Message-ID: <CF8425EB0A9B4CA1B4EC162DCDD4121A@MSWIRED.local> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart / mixed; boundary = "- -- - = _NextPart_000_0014_01C80CC3.CE34EC30" X-Priority: 3 7B47F900:01C80CFE] X-Virus-Scanned: CleanMail 2.5 at mf21 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message X-Spam-Status: No, hits = x required = 6 WHITELISTED Importance: normal Priority: normal X-Spam 45:16 -0700 thread-index: AcgNAAcjeOFxLMPmSFSGMXEojsIVQQ = = Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:45:15 -0700 Message-ID: <39EC3355E7D94C32AD8EE12648B786B5@MSWIRED.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart / mixed; boundary = "- -- - = _NextPart_000_0014_01C80CC3.CE34EC30" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority mf03 X-Spam-Status: No, hits = x required = 6 WHITELISTED Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal X-Spam-Level: Priority: normal Windows Server SBS Discussions AcgNAA229lkWCPy (1) Exchange Server really no duplicated e-mails. For example, two duplicated e-mails reached to ISP, by chance one e-mail is downloaded to exchange and one left at ISP, so you could
at each physical computer is there another option via group policy or a script by chance? Remote desktop is not possible since the workstations are windows 2000. Any advice is much Install new font file - --> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:03:01 -0800 - --> Lines: 6 - --> Message-ID: <9037BD6A-04B1-470B-9CC9-FBD0B9B6C864@microsoft.com> - --> MIME-Version: 1.0 - --> Content-Type: text / plain; - --> charset = "Utf-8" - --> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit - --> X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 - --> Content-Class: urn:content-classes message - --> Importance: normal - --> Priority: normal - --> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2992 - --> Newsgroups at each - --> physical computer is there another option via group policy or a script by - --> chance? Remote desktop is not possible since the workstations are windows - --> 2000. Any advice is much Install new font file - --> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 19:14:00 -0800 - --> Lines: 72 - --> Message-ID: <0C80A9FA-3D52-4145-B583-F6CB1F6D9BAE@microsoft.com> - --> MIME-Version: 1.0 - --> Content-Type: text / plain; - --> charset = "Utf-8" - --> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit - --> X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 - --> Content-Class: urn:content-classes message - --> Importance: normal - --> Priority: normal - --> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2992 - --> Newsgroups
and let you know what they said. Thank you for stopping by to leave a message for me. Meg Hi Meg, So pleased that you managed to get back here - that accordance with his suggestions. - - Dave Hi Winston, Thank you for stopping by to leave a message. * ** Aw, I had no idea it is that leaner. . . * ** It make sense what you are I am ok for now. I sure will add more RAM when I get a chance. Regarding Dave, I thought he has been helpful to me. At least he knows about your ISP set that up for you. Cheers. . . . . . .Heather Hi Heather, Thank you for your message. I always learn a lot by comig to micorsoft forum. I apprecite people who stop As for "BD" I do not know him well, but I apprecite him leaving a message regarding my concern) I am always amazed how people here are so knowledgable. Take care 2010 version since I have this fairly short time (since January). When I get a chance I will contact Norton asking where to look up on my NIS 2010. I apprecite Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:16:19 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 11 Message-ID: <hnuc8n$c2a$1@speranza.aioe.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: wdBKXUNC377BfgQYktENLA.user.speranza.aioe.org Content-Type: text / plain; format = flowed; charset = "iso-8859-1"; reply-type = original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00
you OWA. It will allow you to override the certificate issues. Microsoft finally got the message about browser security, but they went a bit over the top, which only encourages people both Internet access and the local network check box, and then click Next. e. A message may appear that warns that the firewall that is provided cannot be configured. You are offered a chance to view information about configuration settings for an existing firewall device. f. On the Network research. To capture the image, we can perform the steps below: (a) When the error message appears, press the Print Screen key several times (this key is located to the right ve configured it to require a client certificate, and it may well give a 'refused' message to someone who doesn't have one. But that's not a default setting. Unfortunately or more characters with an umlaut in their user names or passwords must change the encoding type setting from Unicode (UTF-8) to Western European (Windows) when they access the OWA to the OWA logon page. b. Right-click the OWA logon Web page, point to Encoding, and then click Western European (Windows). 2. This problem can occurs because of incorrect permissions
Database (1) Nashville (1) LinkId (1) Serif (1) Do you get any type of error message? What are the symptoms? Which online services are you trying to access? Kollen When I Close", instead of the credit card transaction window popping up, I instead get the following message: The web address http: / / go.microsoft.com / fwlink / ?linkId = 74018&MoaSki. . . . .is not supported by to even open MOA Express. When I click to open the app, I get a message that says "Microsoft Office Accounting has stopped working". MOA is our lifeline and contains all without the risk of losing all the data? - -- -- - = _NextPart_0001_1ED4B1F7 Content-Type: text / plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Can you try the following; 1) Go to Company menu, click Preferences, and receive same sort of issue. Thanks, James - -- -- - = _NextPart_0001_1ED4B1F7 Content-Type: text / x-rtf Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit { \ rtf1 \ ansi \ ansicpg1252 \ deff0 \ deflang1033{ \ fonttbl{ \ f0 \ fnil \ fprq2 \ fcharset0 MS Sans Serif;}} \ viewkind4 help us diagnose your problem more quickly. Kollen - -- -- - = _NextPart_0001_1F36EF90 Content-Type: text / plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, We have had some reports of MOA UK Express not launching properly but get into application and connect. Thanks, James - -- -- - = _NextPart_0001_1F36EF90 Content-Type: text / x-rtf Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit { \ rtf1 \ ansi \ ansicpg1252 \ deff0 \ deflang1033{ \ fonttbl{ \ f0 \ fnil \ fprq2 \ fcharset0 MS Sans Serif;}} \ viewkind4 thank you. found and moved to documents folder. - -- -- - = _NextPart_0001_1FA2E419 Content-Type: text / plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, You should be able to follow the KB article as well to locate