Windows Server - BAM question

Asked By andre
11-Apr-07 01:38 PM
When I view my activity in BAM (Activity Search) all of my time stamps match
up with my time zone... when I view Aggregations all of the activity is in
UTC.

Why is BAM converting from UTC to my time zone for Activity Search but it
doesn't bother for Aggregations?
BizTalk
(1)
UTC
(1)
BAM
(1)
MSDN
(1)
OLAP
(1)
PST
(1)
CST
(1)
DTS
(1)
  ndaia replied...
17-Apr-07 01:45 PM
Business reason:
Primarily to avoid confusion in KPIs - data from one quarter (or year) can
get rolled into KPIs for the next quarter depending on the time dimension.
For example,  if 10 purchase orders arrive at 11:30 PM 12/31/2006 in a
server that is located in PST, then they would roll up into 2006 numbers
for PST but 2007 numbers for EST,CST etc. That would be confusing. UTC
would ensure same numbers across timezones.

Additional Technical Reason:
OLAP data is pre-populated by DTS task. The aggregation page directly
connects to OLAP. So data would be consistent across all time zones; we
chose UTC over server timezone as it is normal practice to align everything
using UTC times.

--------------------
match
in

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

Connected Systems Division Team


Get Connected!
Meet and interact with key BizTalk Server program managers, developers, and
testers, and let them and other BizTalk Server community team members and
Most Valuable Professionals help you solve your product questions.

Navigate to http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/ in your
webrowser and register as a managed customer to receive MSDN Managed
Newsgroup Support!

MSDN managed newsgroups are available in English to MSDN Universal,
Enterprise, Professional, and Operating Systems subscribers to receive
free, unlimited technical support on select Microsoft technologies as well
as to share ideas with other subscribers.
Create New Account
help
Deploying / installing BizTalk BAM Excel Add-In Windows Server I'm running BizTalk Server 2006 R2. I found the online help topic titled the BAM Add-In for Excel on any computer, whether BizTalk Server 2006 is installed on that computer or not. However, you must first install the binaries listed in the following table for the BAM Add-In for Excel to work." Then it lists nine dlls and versions with absolutely a business analysts workstation so that they have the Add-In? I've got the BAM Excel Add-In on my BizTalk development box. That's no problem and meets my needs as a developer. But I
BizTalk 2006 BAM has a bug! Windows Server Hi BizTalkers, I have found a bug in BizTalk 2006 BAM! I have a BAM implementation that tracks data across a number of Orchestrations. The eventstream being used is Direct I send exactly the same message throught each time, I see a bug in the bam in BizTalk 2006. The field that takes a datetime and stores it is not always populated, i the same message through with an interval between them the datatime is save in the bam activity correctly. However when I send a number of messages through, say 10 at a
BizTalk 2006 BAM Issue Windows Server Hi, Statement of the problem: I have created a very simple BAM Activity with three fields: 1. . Received (when the orchestration starts) 2. . Processed (when the orchestration InterceptorException Invalid Interceptor Configuration. The first trackpoint must be TraceStartTrackpoint Exception type: BAMTraceException Source: Microsoft.BizTalk.Bam.EventObservation Target Site: Microsoft.BizTalk.Bam.EventObservation.BAMTraceFragment CreateTraceFragment() The following is a stack trace that identifies the location where the exception occured at Microsoft.BizTalk.Bam.EventObservation.TraceInstanceToken.CreateTraceFragment() at Microsoft.BizTalk.Bam.EventObservation.TraceCompleteTrackPoint.Execute(EventStream eventStream, IBAMDataExtractor extractor
BAM in a Multiple Computer Environment Windows Server The BizTalk 2006 Installation Guide - Multiserver includes a section titled BizTalk Servers in a BizTalk Group, Active / Passive SQL Server Cluster, and an Active / Passive SSO Cluster. We want to install BAM. Should BAM be installed on BOTH BizTalk servers? Or are there state issues with having it installed in two places without clustering? Or does BAM logically *have* to be installed somewhere else? The installation guide addresses breaking up the BAM